top of page

The ATS Debate

  • Writer: Sarah Seavey
    Sarah Seavey
  • Jan 26, 2021
  • 3 min read

As a professional in the career field, my LinkedIn is filled with coaches, counselors, educators, and recruiters. My feed has been filled with what I will call the great debate, but in reality, the debate is anything but great.


In this article, I will breakdown both sides of the debate and, in the end, provide you with the truth of what an ATS is, does, and what that means for you, the applicant.



The Debate

The is around Applicant Tracking Systems, and in my opinion, it is tiring. The language used by both sides of the argument is very misleading. Which, in the end, honestly confuses applicants the most.


Let’s break the argument down:


Robot 🤖 = Applicant Tracking System

Human 👤 = any user of the ATS - which varies between hiring manager, HR, recruiter, etc.


Side one: The robot rejects applicants.

Side two: The human rejects applicants.


Both these statements focus on one side and ignore the fact that BOTH the systems and humans are involved in reality. The debate would be far less of a hot topic if we looked at the whole picture.


✅ The recruiter (user) can decide what makes an applicant a best fit, and these criteria are entered into the system (robot/ATS). The system then can parse information from the applications/resumes based on said criteria.


✅ Users can set qualification questions that, in turn, can cause the system to send rejection emails.


So no, robots are not making decisions autonomously. They are systems with settings, inputs, and coding that have the ability to initiate functions (such as sending emails) based on users' discretion. If you get a rejection email from a system, the user has set the functions and made decisions that determined you are not a best fit.


I think this topic is a hot discussion because it creates engagement on posts. People love to argue when, in fact, both are right and wrong. My clients, students, and alums do not believe robots make decisions and think on their own. They understand that computers, automation systems, any system operates based on directions from a user. However, some people may believe a computer is deciding if the resume makes it to the user. In fact, there are countless posts and articles with clickbait titles the tell applicants they have to “beat a robot” or “get the highest score" in an ATS, or your resume will not be seen. These statements are very misleading and simply not factual.


Quick debunking: No ATS hides or deletes resumes. The user has access to ALL the resumes, ALWAYS.

What an Applicant Tracking System Is

The purpose of all Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) is exactly what the name says - the system creates applicant profiles so the company can track you in the recruiting process/pipeline.

What an Applicant Tracking System Does

This brings me to the point that there are many different ATS, each with its own settings or ways of managing the process/pipeline. Here is just a summary of what some applicant tracking systems provide the user with:

  • A match score (many recruiters don't trust the validity of these scores)

  • Buckets based on a percentage match to the criteria

  • List applicants in a table format with columns such as years of experience, education, current job title, expected salary (this information is pulled from your application and/or resume, but most of the time your application).

  • List of applicant profiles (no scores, no buckets, no hidden profiles - just a list)


What this all Means for You the Applicant


The best way to get your resume seen is to be the best fit for the job! It sounds simple enough, but typically, there is one opening and hundreds of applicants. Mathematically, over the course of a job search process, there will be more rejection emails than offers.

The not-so-secrete way to get your resume seen is to be clear in your application/resume how you are a great match for the job.

Do you have questions about ATS or your job search process? Please send us your questions!


 
 
 

2 Comments


elsiebre.we.r1.6.921
5 days ago

Mình mua vé số chủ yếu cho vui thôi, kiểu xem kết quả như một trò giải trí nên không đặt nặng chuyện đổi đời. Trước đây nghe người ta bàn tán về “cầu” nọ “cầu” kia, mình cũng thử để ý xem có gì hay ho không. Theo dõi một thời gian thì đúng là thỉnh thoảng có vài dạng số lặp lại làm mình chú ý, nhưng mình vẫn nghi ngờ là do mình tự tưởng tượng ra. Có lúc đọc mấy bài soi như https://soicauxsmb.io/soi-cau-atrungroi-mb.html mình ghi lại vài gạch đầu dòng, rồi chờ hôm sau đối chiếu xem trúng được gì. Trúng lặt vặt thì vui, còn lệch thì cũng nhiều nên mình luôn nhắc bản…

Like

laurasanms311989
Aug 08

Mình thỉnh thoảng lướt mấy bài soi lô đề cho biết, kiểu đọc cho vui để hiểu người ta nhìn cầu kèo và chuỗi kết quả ra sao. Hồi đầu mình nghĩ chuyện này hoàn toàn hên xui, nhưng xem nhiều mới thấy có vài cách thống kê nghe cũng hợp lý, dù trúng trật thất thường. Có dạo mình còn tự ghi lại theo dàn với tần suất, rồi nhận ra cảm xúc của mình bị kéo đi nhiều hơn số liệu nên giờ tỉnh táo hơn, coi như giải trí thôi. Mình thích bài nào trình bày rõ vì sao chọn số, chứ không nói đại. Đọc đoạn Dự đoán số đề hôm nay lại làm mình nhớ…

Like
bottom of page